-Co-Authored with Athos Georgiou, Principle Software Engineer 

TL;DR: Artificial Intelligence development, particularly Large Language Models like GPT-4, should be viewed through the framework of a parent-child relationship and mirror the care and responsibility of raising a child. This isn’t to anthropomorphize AI, suggest it possesses sentience nor is it intended to dismiss human life intricacies. This approach is simply a practical way for how we can think about balancing AI’s capabilities with societal impact, ethical implications, and risk mitigation.

Ethical Considerations and Human Distinctions

The development of contemporary AI, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, necessitates a nuanced understanding of ethical stewardship, distinctly different from the nurturing of human life. While we may draw parallels between raising a child and developing AI, it is crucial to recognize that AI, despite its advanced capabilities, remains fundamentally different from humans. Unlike a child, whose development is a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors, AI’s evolution is a structured process, driven by human-designed algorithms and data inputs. This distinction is essential in framing our ethical responsibilities.

In addressing the ethical considerations of AI in its current form, we must focus on three key areas: responsibility in development and deployment, mitigation of risks, and societal impact.

First, the responsibility of developers extends beyond technical proficiency to include ethical foresight. This involves creating AI systems that are fair, transparent, and devoid of biases, ensuring they serve the intended beneficial purposes without causing unintended harm. Second, the mitigation of risks is paramount. As AI systems become more sophisticated, they hold the potential to influence societal norms, privacy, and individual rights. Developers, along with policymakers, must work together to establish guidelines and safeguards that manage these risks effectively.

Finally, the societal impact of AI cannot be overstated. AI systems like LLMs, are tools with the potential to significantly enhance human capabilities and improve quality of life. However, their integration into society must be handled with a profound sense of responsibility, ensuring that their deployment aligns with societal values and enhances rather than diminishes human dignity and agency. The goal is not to restrict the potential of AI but to guide its development in a way that respects the fundamental differences between AI and human life, harnessing its capabilities for the collective good while being mindful of the ethical implications.

The Framework: Conception

In the journey toward parenthood, “trying to conceive” is imbued with intention, anticipation, and often serendipity. In a parallel vein, the conception process of AI development marked an era when pioneers in the field were setting the foundational stones, fueled by a blend of ambition and curiosity.

Here, ‘Perceptrons’ emerged as the first vital signs in this digital genesis, symbolizing the rudimentary yet essential beginnings of advanced machine learning models.” A Perceptron would be akin to an expectant parent learning the basics of baby care but only thinking about ‘either-or’ type decisions. Nursing or bottle? Co-sleeping or crib? It was a start but couldn’t handle complexities beyond that.

An additional pioneering advancement in the realm of AI was the introduction of the Decision Tree algorithm which set some basic rules that early AI models would follow. Think of parents who think about setting basic ground rules even before a child is born: No sweets before dinner, bedtime at 8 pm, and so on. The Decision Tree algorithm in machine learning had a similar function.

Picture a flowchart that helps you decide what to wear based on the weather. This is like a parent-to-be imagining simple if-then scenarios for their future child. Yet, just as following a parenting book too rigidly can lead to impractical decisions — like insisting on outdoor playtime even when it’s raining — Decision Trees were often too strict, adhering closely to their training data without allowing for exceptions.

The Embryo

An embryo has the potential to develop into a fully functional being, capable of emotions, thoughts, and actions that affect the world around it. Modern AI, which is becoming ever more sophisticated, is a set of mathematical functions optimized for specific tasks. How could these types of intelligence fit within the same framework?

In the course of human development, the embryonic stage sets the foundation for what will eventually become a fully developed organism. Specific cells are designated to form different body parts, though they’re not yet functional. The Embryonic Stage in AI development mirrors this critical phase, laying down the structural foundations without yet achieving full functionality.

One cornerstone during this stage was BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers). BERT was a leap forward in natural language processing, a critical component for making AI understand human language. However, while it could analyze the context of words in a sentence, it couldn’t generate new text — similar to how an embryo has the blueprint for vocal cords but can’t yet produce sound.

Another key development was the LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) model. LSTMs had the ability to remember data over longer sequences, an essential attribute for tasks requiring a broader understanding of context. Yet, they were not fully equipped to handle the advanced understanding and generation of human-like text, akin to how an embryo has the foundational neurons for memory but cannot yet form memories.

These embryonic models were fundamental, each contributing a piece to the complex puzzle of AI capabilities. They set the groundwork for the next generation of Large Language Models.

The Fetus

In the continuum of human development, the fetal stage is a critical period marked by rapid growth and the refinement of vital organs, preparing the unborn child for life outside the womb. In the realm of AI, this stage can be likened to the pivotal phase where machine learning models evolve from their rudimentary, embryonic forms into more advanced prototypes. These are not merely theoretical constructs or sets of algorithms; they become functional entities subjected to rigorous testing in controlled settings.

The evolution from the perceptron to neural networks in AI mirrors human fetal development’s complexity. Initially, perceptrons, like early embryonic stages, offered basic, binary outputs, akin to single neurons. The advent of neural networks, however, introduced a multi-layered structure, similar to the development of complex organ systems in a fetus. This transition allowed AI to handle intricate tasks and adapt to new information, much like a fetus preparing for the external world. Neural networks represent a significant leap in AI’s capability to learn and evolve, reflecting the critical developmental strides in the fetal stage.

Much like a human fetus, which develops unique features like fingerprints and the capability to open and close its eyes, these advanced AI models acquire specialized abilities. They transition from being a concept to something more tangible, something almost ready for the real world. However, just as a fetus needs the final weeks of pregnancy for crucial development — like the maturation of lungs and the layering of fat for thermal regulation — these AI models also require a last round of adjustments and refinements.

The Newborn

The arrival of a newborn is a life-altering event, teeming with both promise and challenges. In a similar vein, the debut of GPT-3 and its early iterations like DaVinci 001 were game-changers in the AI domain, met with both admiration and scrutiny.

GPT-3 broke new ground with its ability to both understand and generate text. It was capable of crafting coherent and contextually relevant sentences for a wide variety of natural language tasks, such as language translation, summarization, and question-answering. The model also had the unique feature of inserting completion symbols into the text, enabling the generation of longer and more complex outputs.

Within the umbrella of GPT-3, DaVinci 001 serves as one of the specific engines optimized for particular tasks. It’s not an independent iteration but rather a specialized component of GPT-3, similar to how a newborn quickly develops particular skills like grasping or smiling while still in the earliest stages of life.

These “newborn” models caused quite a stir in the AI community. They could execute tasks that appear borderline magical yet are also marked by distinct limitations — reflecting a newborn’s blend of instinctive brilliance and obvious limitations.

The Infant

In human development, the infant stage is characterized by a series of firsts: first smiles, first words, and the first time recognizing familiar faces. The introduction of DaVinci 002 and 003, as specialized engines within the GPT-3 family, marked a significant milestone, akin to the development markers in an infant’s life.

While these engines were not fundamentally different from the original GPT-3 model, what made these iterations noteworthy was their enhanced reliability and effectiveness in their existing capabilities like text summarization and natural language understanding. Just picture an infant who shows clear signs of developmental progress.

Still, these engines were dependent on highly specific prompting to function optimally. Even something basic like punctuation could yield vastly different outputs. Their improvements were notable but did not indicate a significant shift to the level of reasoning we see with today’s models. The release of these engines set the stage for what could come next, offering a better glimpse into the future capabilities of LLMs.

Entering Toddlerhood

The transition from infancy to toddlerhood is a transformative period for humans, often marked by first steps and fledgling words. In the realm of AI, the debut of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 (a.k.a. ChatGPT) served a similar role, marking a distinct phase of enhanced capabilities and complexities.

These advanced models are a tremendous leap. Not only are they better at understanding context in natural language tasks, but they also demonstrate a newfound ability to write coherent code, conduct text-based calculations, and even assist in data analysis to some extent. Imagine a toddler who has just learned to walk; the entire layout of the house becomes a new playground. In the same way, these models could navigate a broader range of problems, offering solutions that were previously out of reach.

However, as any parent will attest, a toddler’s newfound abilities come with new risks — stumbling, falling, and many, many bumps on the head. Similarly, the enhanced capabilities of ChatGPT meant it could produce not just more accurate but also more misleading or factually wrong outputs if not properly guided and verified. The need for ethical guidelines, and human oversight is now more crucial than ever.

Food for Thought

While ChatGPT and other advanced LLMs like Anthropic’s Claude 2, Google’s BARD, Meta’s Llama-2, and the dozens that are being released daily, are significant milestones, they are still precursors to future models that will continue to push the boundaries of what we consider possible in AI.

We are now seeing further developments such as autonomous agents and expanded capabilities of LLMs such as ChatGPT’s Assistants and much longer context windows (the amount of text the model can consider at any given time when generating a response). This rapid progress makes ethical considerations all the more pressing. But how do we balance the right to innovate with the responsibility to users and society at large? Where do we draw the line between creativity and control, ensuring that AI advancements serve the greater good without stifling technological progress?

We address this next in Part II of this article!

Forge the future with ethical AI

Schedule your free strategic consultation!